I was thinking of writing a little about man logicks, which is the backward “reasoning” of males combined with their violent insistence on their own “superiority” (lol) and their hysterical lies and manipulations that they support systemically and attempt to pass off as truths.
When I say that their “reasoning” is backwards, what I mean is that males decide something and then work backwards from what they want instead of looking at evidence with an open mind. A good example of this is male study of Amazon culture.
Males kept women out of archaeology, as with all education, because they need to control the narrative, as well as have the necessary house slave to keep their home while they are off doing important male things. When male archaeologists began to study the Amazon culture and they found irrefutable evidence of female warriors, they interpreted it the only way that males understand—through their own white male bias.
So instead of looking at the artifacts with an open mind, they made a lot of assumptions, and those assumptions were based on their own ideas of male and female. Because males know everything.
The males study of the Amazon amounted to this……….
OH NOES! LADIES DON’T BE WARRIORS! SOMETHING TERRIBLY HORRIBLY AWFUL MUST HAVE HAPPENED TO ALL OF THE MENZ! THAT IS THE ONLY REASON THAT LADIEZ WOULD ABANDON THEIR HIGH HEELS AND LIPSTICKS AND DO THE MALE JOB OF WARRING!
**You can read all about this in “When God was a Woman” by Merlin Stone.**
In other words, males centered themselves into their discovery and proceeded to work backwards to prove what they decided could be the only explanation. They have so little creativity in them that they cannot conceive of women as anything other then their sexual and domestic servants.
And then I stumbled into this post, from 4thwavefeminists………….
http://4thwavefeminists.com/lesbophobia-in-evolutionary-psychology/
……….and I don’t have to write about it, because Megan Lance did, and it is an excellent piece of writing.
Man logicks has an actual name, the naturalistic fallacy. And here I thought that I had discovered it. 😉
The post is a very interesting and informative read. Basically, it is a feminist critique of evolutionary psychology and what a steaming pile of bullshit it is. Here is one tiny sample:
If women wanted to maximize resources for themselves and for their offspring, their best strategy would be to have multiple mates and have the father of their child be unknown, so that each of the men are investing as if the child is his. Indeed, children who are born into cultures which practice partible paternity (where it is believed that multiple men can be the father of a child) have multiple men investing in them and are more likely to live past childhood than children with only a single father.
If you have been reading me for a while, you will know how much I love this and why.
Megan Lance shows very plainly how males have bent our existence into what will benefit them with no regard to our humanity or dignity, and without respect to our individuality or personal wants, needs, or desires. Evolutionary psychology is just another male lie utilized to uphold male supremacy. Because we all know that male supremacy will not stand against reality and truth.
I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I did.
Jayne
RadFemSpiraling 